<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Split Your PageRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/</link>
	<description>A blog about our thoughts on entrepreneurship, teamwork, our services, the Web and anything we find interesting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:50:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joanna Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-68968</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/#comment-68968</guid>
		<description>Your article summarizes the importance of avoiding splitting the pagerank for identical pages with different urls.  I wrote an article about dynamically creating a 301 redirect without using a rewrite rule.  
http://www.smtusa.com/blog/posts/optimize-seo-pageranking-using-301-redirect.html
I linked your article in my blog post.  Great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article summarizes the importance of avoiding splitting the pagerank for identical pages with different urls.  I wrote an article about dynamically creating a 301 redirect without using a rewrite rule.<br />
<a href="http://www.smtusa.com/blog/posts/optimize-seo-pageranking-using-301-redirect.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smtusa.com/blog/posts/optimize-seo-pageranking-using-301-redirect.html</a><br />
I linked your article in my blog post.  Great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-11700</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/#comment-11700</guid>
		<description>Redirecting your inbound links so as to consolidate your top level domain is a great idea that anyone maintaining a commercial web site should implement right from the start.

However, Freshbooks seems to have gone about it using the subdomain that should be high on everyone&#039;s priority to drop.  Namely &quot;www&quot;

&quot;www&quot; was appropriate in 1995.  It was relevant in 1997. In 2000 it started showing signs of being superfluous. In 2006 it&#039;s just completely and obviously redundant.

No one needs to be reminded that a domain name is a valid web address.  The TLD (.com .net .org etc..) do that already. The &quot;www&quot; subdomain only serves to marr the site&#039;s brand within the address bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redirecting your inbound links so as to consolidate your top level domain is a great idea that anyone maintaining a commercial web site should implement right from the start.</p>
<p>However, Freshbooks seems to have gone about it using the subdomain that should be high on everyone&#8217;s priority to drop.  Namely &#8220;www&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;www&#8221; was appropriate in 1995.  It was relevant in 1997. In 2000 it started showing signs of being superfluous. In 2006 it&#8217;s just completely and obviously redundant.</p>
<p>No one needs to be reminded that a domain name is a valid web address.  The TLD (.com .net .org etc..) do that already. The &#8220;www&#8221; subdomain only serves to marr the site&#8217;s brand within the address bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Sarmiento</title>
		<link>http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-10662</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Sarmiento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/#comment-10662</guid>
		<description>Hi BJ,
Great tip! I&#039;ve been into Google Sitemaps/Webmaster Tools briefly before and didn&#039;t even notice that tool.

Although there is a note there that says Google doesn&#039;t guarantee the URL you prefer will show in the search results. You could however use this tool in combination with an htaccess redirect which may further help in improving your PageRank.

But again, nice tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi BJ,<br />
Great tip! I&#8217;ve been into Google Sitemaps/Webmaster Tools briefly before and didn&#8217;t even notice that tool.</p>
<p>Although there is a note there that says Google doesn&#8217;t guarantee the URL you prefer will show in the search results. You could however use this tool in combination with an htaccess redirect which may further help in improving your PageRank.</p>
<p>But again, nice tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Vicks</title>
		<link>http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-10654</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Vicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2006/08/16/dont-split-your-pagerank/#comment-10654</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s webmaster tools ( http://www.google.com/webmasters/ ) have an option that allows you to set a preferred domain, as of quite recently.  Might help avoid hacking at the .htaccess file</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s webmaster tools ( <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/webmasters/</a> ) have an option that allows you to set a preferred domain, as of quite recently.  Might help avoid hacking at the .htaccess file</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
