<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving the usability of your website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2008/03/27/improving-the-usability-of-your-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2008/03/27/improving-the-usability-of-your-website/</link>
	<description>A blog about our thoughts on entrepreneurship, teamwork, our services, the Web and anything we find interesting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:27:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kip Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2008/03/27/improving-the-usability-of-your-website/comment-page-1/#comment-47492</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2008/03/27/improving-the-usability-of-your-website/#comment-47492</guid>
		<description>RE: If you’re interested in learning more, there’s a lot out there but I’d suggest starting with (and referring to often) this site.

&quot;this site&quot; is a link to http://www.usability.gov/. I would suggest using a more descriptive link text. &quot;this site&quot; is almost as bad as &quot;click here.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: If you’re interested in learning more, there’s a lot out there but I’d suggest starting with (and referring to often) this site.</p>
<p>&#8220;this site&#8221; is a link to <a href="http://www.usability.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.usability.gov/</a>. I would suggest using a more descriptive link text. &#8220;this site&#8221; is almost as bad as &#8220;click here.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2008/03/27/improving-the-usability-of-your-website/comment-page-1/#comment-46975</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freshbooks.com/blog/2008/03/27/improving-the-usability-of-your-website/#comment-46975</guid>
		<description>Most of my web design work has been in the nonprofit world and I constantly have to try to remind decision-makers of point #1. Over and over I gently suggest that they are not their website&#039;s target audience. 

When I&#039;m not successful we end up with a navigation that reflects the nonprofit&#039;s organizational structure rather than the search needs of visitors. At one place I was able to create a kind of shadow site where I pulled pieces from across programs and organized them according to visitor-oriented themes. I doubt it will surprise anyone here that this became one of the most visited sections of the site. Past tense: an inattentive subsequent webmaster took it down (natch).

I think these dynamics are one reason that Wikipedia articles are often more useful to the casual visitor (the bulk of visitors) than official websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of my web design work has been in the nonprofit world and I constantly have to try to remind decision-makers of point #1. Over and over I gently suggest that they are not their website&#8217;s target audience. </p>
<p>When I&#8217;m not successful we end up with a navigation that reflects the nonprofit&#8217;s organizational structure rather than the search needs of visitors. At one place I was able to create a kind of shadow site where I pulled pieces from across programs and organized them according to visitor-oriented themes. I doubt it will surprise anyone here that this became one of the most visited sections of the site. Past tense: an inattentive subsequent webmaster took it down (natch).</p>
<p>I think these dynamics are one reason that Wikipedia articles are often more useful to the casual visitor (the bulk of visitors) than official websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
